Відео

All this time and money and still creationists can't find a flaw in evolution that creationism can fix.

We have never proven we can make life from chemicals in a lab bro😂 people need to stop

0:25 - _Walsh: "It's hard to think of any industry that's enjoyed more success over the past 20 years or so than Big Pharma."_ No, it's not. Right-wing grift is all the rage right now, as you well know. 4:00 - _Walsh: "Suicide rates are going up."_ Stated as if he hasn't been part of the reason.

You are making stupid arguments to purport pseudo-scientism. There are dozens of scientific papers that discredited the doctrine of abiogenesis… no Papers support it.

Good news for Nebraska, not allowing kids to be neutered and protecting others from being murdered

Sad that people want rights to murder their own children that they irresponsibly conceived

Some of the worst atrocities that occurred in the 19th century was caused by atheists. Hltler, Stalin, Moa, Pol Pot.

You are demonstrating how it could have been done. That doesn't prove what he did or didn't do. We simply don't have enough evidence to know what he did, or whether it was legitimate. You want to debunk it, but you started with a judgment, and sought to prove your point. That is called confirmation bias, and suggests that you haven't actually proven anything. It is very likely that he is a charlatan, but your experiment does nothing to prove that.

Evolution is impossible. There is no need to debunk it. Why the need to debunk something that doesn't happen?

Great info once again professor. Patience is hard to come by with this lot but you do well. Better than I could at any rate. #Rage

Mt question is if the earth is flat why would the government say its not what do they gain

3:42 Okay I was in agreement with you up until that point, where you lost me. Look, I don’t like anti-vaxxers, I think they’re really dumb and problematic. However, the government should not be the authority for what people can and can’t put into their own bodies, as that violates people’s right to voluntarily choose and just leads to the increase of the state using coercion and force. Unless you’re not referring to the government, then I retract my statement. A more ethical solution that doesn’t violate someone’s First Amendment rights is to counter incorrect information with more factually correct information. Probably the best solution to this problem, and one that’s often never brought up, is freedom of association, which I recommend anyone who reads this to read into freedom of association as it fixes a lot of problems in society. Basically, the dumb anti-vaxxers can freely associate with whom they want in their communities, and the rest of society can freely associate with whom they want, and if someone chooses to infringe on that, the private communities have the right to discriminate against and remove these problematic people through physical removal. Hoppe is pretty based in my opinion.

By self replicating, the ID proponent means that an entity replicates it's entire self completely and not simply replicating only a portion of a self. The original video it was responded to stated that ribosomes could copy thenselves, which seems to imply the entire self. The argument is that there is zero self replication of this sort.

Any serious LIVE debate between creationists and people believing in ABIOGENESIS? Please do share

Just you saying that an abstract is a synopsis of the findings in the paper… shows absolute naivety. A Pwof Dave Dunning K type naivety. Lets look at an example… Gerald Joyce and self replicating RNA… 😂 “RNA enzymes have been made to undergo self-sustained replication in the absence of proteins, providing the basis for an artificial genetic system. An RNA enzyme that catalyzes the RNA-templated joining of RNA was converted to a format whereby two enzymes catalyze each other’s synthesis from a total of four component substrates. These cross-replicating RNA enzymes were optimized so that they can undergo self-sustained exponential amplification at a constant temperature and in the absence of proteins or other biological materials.” Then read the final dismal results and then his conclusions… Er duh! “In order to support greater complexity in a system of cross-replicating RNAs it will be necessary to constrain the set of substrates so that each enzyme can secure its own substrates without being overwhelmed by other substrates in the mixture. One way to do this is to choose a set of substrates that are more distinguishable than the ones used here. Another approach is to adjust the concentrations of the various substrates in proportion to their utilization by the population of enzymes. It is not clear how this would be done within the system, but it could be achieved using a deconstructive PCR procedure in which the population of newly-formed enzymes is used to generate a corresponding population of substrates (11). In this way both the successful enzymes and their component substrates are inherited from one generation to the next. Another important challenge for an artificial genetic system is to support a broad range of encoded functions, well beyond replication itself. It is possible to insert a functional domain within the central stem-loop of the cross-replicating enzymes so that replication is dependent on execution of that encoded function (Lam & Joyce, unpublished results). It would be much more powerful, however, to have a system in which novel function emerges during the course of selective amplification. The self-sustained evolution of RNA with open-ended opportunities for discovering novel function likely has not occurred on Earth since the time of the RNA world, and continues to present an intriguing research opportunity.” You have to read the whole paper! www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652413/ 😂😂😂😂😂😂

This video really attacks a strawman… so let’s go over the details.. the final point that any random sequence of codons could ever produce a functional protein… a functioning biopolymer molecular structure, capable of secondary, tertiary or quaternary structure is demonstrably false. It clearly shows a lack of the ability to grasp what a cell membrane or organelle is. So no, you are letting a dogma dictate the processes, in defiance of the actual scientific facts. Lookup the importance glycosidic bonds in a cell membrane just to begin the process of cell construction. Even using a Google search can debunk this video. LOL

Getting tired or you just cannot explain it scientifically!!

Getting tired or you just cannot explain it scientifically!!

Dr. James Tour, an American chemist and nanotechnologist, was right when he stated that NOT A SINGLE SCIENTIST HAS EVER PRODUCED LIFE FROM NON-LIFE MATERIALS! AND NOT EVEN ONE LIVING SINGLE CELL ORGANISM WAS EVER PRODUCED IN A LAB IN PREBIOTIC STAGE! This is true in spite of all of the advancements in scientific technologies today in this year of 2024!!!! Darwin was never a scientist and didn't know the complexities in the composition of a single living cell when he wrote his theories, and that was in the 1800's, now science is proving more for an intelligent design!! Tour was awarded the Royal Society of Chemistry's Centenary Prizefor innovations in materials chemistry with applications in medicine and nanotechnology. Tour was inducted into the National Academy of Inventors in 2015. He was named among "The 50 most Influential Scientists in the World Today" by TheBestSchools.org in 2014. Tour was named "Scientist of the Year" by R&D Magazine in 2013.[51] Tour won the ACS Nano Lectureship Award from the American Chemical Society in 2012. Tour was ranked one of the top 10 chemists in the world over the past decade by Thomson Reuters in 2009. That year, he was also made a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2005, Tour's journal article "Directional Control in Thermally Driven Single-Molecule Nanocars" was ranked the Most Accessed Journal Article by the American Chemical Society. Tour has twice won the George R. Brown Award for Superior Teaching at Rice University in 2007 and 2012. In 2016, Tour was listed as an ISI highly cited researcher.

The irony of you claiming to debunk pseudoscience while literally promoting pseudoscience like abiogenesis

The same “science” responsible for abiogenesis and evolution is the reason we have iPhones? What an absurd statement. That would mean not a single engineer would be able to perform their work unless they believed in evolution. If that were true you would have ZERO scientists who disagree with evolution. Find me a single physicist who thinks the earth is flat. One is observable and based on mathematics and science and the other is not. One is based on belief about the past and one is not. The blatant dishonesty or unintentional ignorance in this video is astounding. Constant logical fallacies. Zero observable evidence.

Are you dronk

I'm a middle eastern non-believer and seeing hijab defending this shit is absolutely disgusting The main issue is that if you read the quran, allah clearly permits children marriage A lot of very popular muslim sites and sheikhs say that marrying children is okay if the girl is fat enough ex: islam web ,ibn baz All the interpretations for surah At-Talaaq verse 4 indicates that marrying children is ok So even if aisha had hit puberty That doesn't mean that we can't marry children

Great review of a Christian video

who is that?

Fallacy: Thus Facts, Denial Inverse God's Words, Stand Under Anti FE

парень ты дурак и болтун 100%))))

Diminishing things you know nothing about isn't debunking.

Last time I checked you need water to make wine yes

Oh damn this video aged poorly

Dr. James Tour, an American chemist and nanotechnologist, was right when he stated that NOT A SINGLE SCIENTIST HAS EVER PRODUCED LIFE FROM NON-LIFE MATERIALS! AND NOT EVEN ONE LIVING SINGLE CELL ORGANISM WAS EVER PRODUCED IN A LAB IN PREBIOTIC STAGE! This is true in spite of all of the advancements in scientific technologies today in this year of 2024!!!! Darwin was never a scientist and didn't know the complexities in the composition of a single living cell when he wrote his theories, and that was in the 1800's, now science is proving more for an intelligent design!! Tour was awarded the Royal Society of Chemistry's Centenary Prizefor innovations in materials chemistry with applications in medicine and nanotechnology. Tour was inducted into the National Academy of Inventors in 2015. He was named among "The 50 most Influential Scientists in the World Today" by TheBestSchools.org in 2014. Tour was named "Scientist of the Year" by R&D Magazine in 2013.[51] Tour won the ACS Nano Lectureship Award from the American Chemical Society in 2012. Tour was ranked one of the top 10 chemists in the world over the past decade by Thomson Reuters in 2009. That year, he was also made a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 2005, Tour's journal article "Directional Control in Thermally Driven Single-Molecule Nanocars" was ranked the Most Accessed Journal Article by the American Chemical Society. Tour has twice won the George R. Brown Award for Superior Teaching at Rice University in 2007 and 2012. In 2016, Tour was listed as an ISI highly cited researcher.

Still annoying as can be but those thingys are large enough.

"uncaused decision making" is linguistic imprecision on both sides

so many equivocation fallacies in these videos... it would be too time consuming to even go through all of them.

3:19 this argument is so annoying. If a constant was different, somethings would be different. It could be minor, it could be major.

4:51 or… these numbers just are what they are… If one number was different, somethings would be different. Maybe a few things, maybe big things.

11:32 annnd here’s the problem… The fact that Ben can dismiss Islam (or any “other” religion) and its followers proves his “belief” in God is not truly grounded. Why would a religious person dismiss another person’s religious beliefs? Surely, one of you are “wrong”… or both of you are… but to dismiss another religion is to dismiss your own.

This video is very ironic. Just sayin

You treat flat earthers kinda like racist(not because theyre racist), you shame and then ignore them. If no one listens to them then they'll eventually shut up. Its legitimately that easy, no need for hate, shit talking or any other behavior that degrades yourself. You cant argue with crazy anyway. Theyll just drag you down to their level

And I have no clue how it’s so hard for you to understand that the right to be born is above the ”right” to have the choice to end another’s life which i could go on all day about how that in itself of itself is NOT a fundamental human right but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. If you biologists were consistent at all you’d agree that life begins at conception, since the zygote is technically alive , but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, how do you justify late term abortion given the premise of the argument, oh what now all the sudden we don’t have the right to be born? There’s a clear contradiction here and I hate how pro choicers just completely ignore that talking point then proceed to complain about THEIR rights. You guys are sick in the head

You'd think they'd at least use decent quality CGI. Honestly this whole fiasco is embarrassing. It's no wonder the deniers are having a field day with it

What you are also saying is windows operating software versions from 1 to 8, windows 10, windows 11 all evolved by themselves just because the have similarities? No, it is evidence that there is a creator for windows. And there you have it, all the genes similarities is evidence before you that there is a creator, whoever you conceived him to be.

How much is big pharma paying you?

Would consider the genetic code to be a literal code as per the definition of code in computer science? Or is it merely analogous to a code?

It works for me. You are doing so much wrong with this video. No different than a serial killer.

We should make our own country

Eric Dubay is also moronically ignoring that things do not weigh less in high or low pressure weather as expected in his relative density stupidity 😮! Gravimeters are sealed from the atmosphere and measure g varying. The surface of the Earth has permanent gravity anomalies (differences from 9.8). A superconducting gravimeter was so sensitive that it detected the gradual increase in g as workmen removed snow from the lab roof.

As someone who stepped away from your channel stick, grew u, and have found my self to be trans in that time, we are honestly really glad your still the great person you were back then.

I hate this woman barely into the video...She's a GBYN and somehow is an authority on viruses...JUST NO! That's the equivalent to giving customer service of a car company the authority of F1 formula racing cars. Not the same thing! You have your area, do not speak about others, cuz you're wrong.